
Where prejudice exists it always discolors our thoughts -Mark Twain
| Subject: |
Extraordinary racist rant by L. Ron Hubbard |
|---|---|
| From: |
co@romeo-klive.nvg.ntnu.no (Chris Owen) |
| Newsgroups: |
alt.religion.scientology, soc.culture.indian |
| Date: |
1 Apr 1997 19:20:43 GMT |
| Msg-ID: |
<33fa5531. 85922337 @news .snafu .de > |
[Original post not found, post that quotes original is used instead. Links added. -ed.K]
I've already shown that the founder of Scientology, L. Ron Hubbard,
was an
overt racist
.
Witness his description of the Chinese as
"Chinks
… who smell of all the baths they haven't taken" and of black
Africans as
"degraded" primitives
who could nonetheless be usefully employed by
"understanding masters
"
(i.e. white Scientologists). He was also very strongly in favour of
"Anglo-Saxon thought"
and against "Euro-Russian philosophies". But I was surprised, even
so, to hear the following extraordinary racist rant on one of his
taped lectures. Because his lectures were note-less,
stream-of-consciousness affairs, they give an unrivalled insight into
Hubbard's thought processes. The lecture in question is "The Control
of Hysteria", given on 15th April 1957. Today it is distributed as
tape #10 of the "Radiation and Your Survival" pack (price
approximately
$300).
In the middle of a lecture about atomic radiation, Hubbard suddenly
starts discussing the Middle East:
"The Scientology religion is based exclusively upon L. Ron Hubbard's research, writings and recorded lectures —
all of which constitute the Scriptures of the religion"Do you know, there's only one group on Earth that can do anything about the Middle East — Scientologists … A Scientologist would have to group-process
the living daylights out of the Arabs [before] you'd get them finally able to accept some aid and assistance. How would you go about it? Well, you'd get some Arabs that could speak English and you'd educate the living daylights out of them until you could group-process them well …
Now we say there's, well, another place in the world — there's India. Wonderful place — except for its people. What's the matter with those people? Can you help those people? No. You can't even govern them any more. Anyone who goes in to govern India has great difficulty. Why? Because its people are beyond the point of no return by past technologies. Nothing man knew could have pulled up by the boot straps the Untouchable of India. Certainly not the Indian philosophies. They're all oriented in the direction of slavery and more slavery.
Another reason India is in such a state of "ungovernability" is that England came to view the inhabitants as individuals rather than economic resources to be exploited.
England's sad old empire was great as long as India was run by the East India Company, etc. etc. Its colonies and dominions did fine right up to the moment the government in Westminster and Whitehall started to run the natives as individuals, bypassing the company controlled colonies. Then the "Empire" started to go broke because it never was a political empire but a commercial one. As a political empire it uniformly failed until about 350 years ago it began to charter companies to rule and govern foreign lands. Then it got an "empire". When it began to by-pass its company heads and set up crown controlled governors and then by-pass these it ceased to be an English Empire and it looks today that soon there won't even be an England. It could not control even one colony the moment it started to govern individual colonial citizens on a by-pass of the colonial companies.
-L. Ron Hubbard, HCOB 28 feb 66, "Why Organizations Stay Small"